Admirable. Yes. A Great Boxer. Absolutely. The President of the Philippines. I don't think so.
Pacquiao is fundamentally a simple man. I say this NOT in a pejorative sense, because simple people often have a refreshing take on insurmountable challenges. However, because Pacquiao did not have the opportunity to grapple with complex issues through most of his life, he is wont to oversimplify potential solutions to the immense problems of the country.
The idea of addressing the squatter problem of the Philippines is a good one. I support it and it should be prioritized by the government and executed efficiently without corruption over many consecutive administrations. However, the notion that "wala silang babayarn kahit piso" is flawed in so many ways. The statement alone is thoroughly irresponsible and downright reckless, particularly from the standpoint of law-abiding and tax-paying citizens like myself, who will ultimately be footing the bill (most of it) for such a massive human relocation and housing undertaking. Of all people, Pacquiao surely has a profound understanding of the painstaking work and incredible sacrifice entailed in any worthwhile endeavor, as evidenced by his own life story. There is no "free lunch" and that goes for all the squatters that aspire for a decent home of their own.
Pacquiao believes he is also the champion of our poor farmers. Yet, he supported the passage of the Rice Tariffication Law, which is just another version of the Coco Levy Fund that has oppressed our coconut farmers up to this day and is now oppressing the much larger agricultural segment of our rice farmers. It's nice to know that Pacquiao realizes his mistake and wants to amend the law. However, the damage has been done and will not be easy to reverse. Pacquiao will predictably be easy prey to advocates of government subsidies (i.e., from the frying pan to the fire) and communist anarchists like Paeng Mariano, who was denied the position of the Secretary of DAR by the Senate's Commission on Appointments for brazenly disregarding the rule of law and wreaking havoc in the countryside during his temporary appointment by Dutae. Notwithstanding, Pacquiao was among the few senators who actually voted in favor of Mariano. It is no wonder that Mariano and his communists cohorts are right behind Pacquiao, as the simple man would be the easiest to exploit to further their communist agenda should Pacquiao become the president.
Pacquiao has been a vocal advocate of buying back shares of government-owned and controlled corporations (GOCCs) that were privatized in recent years. He seems to think that doing this would increase government revenues (in addition to taxes) so that the government (and he as the president) would have more resources to help the poor. This is where I draw the line, because it has been proven time and time again that bigger government, particularly in the Philippines, means more inefficiencies and even greater corruption, which only results in the enslavement of the citizens by a parasitic government. This has been the case in the Philippines since the comprehensive institutionalization of a government kleptocracy under the Marcos Dictatorship, which has only been exacerbated over the years. Read "The Irrelevance of the Philippine Government" and "Taxation is Theft."
I believe Pacquiao wants to help the poor. He just does NOT have the capacity to properly execute his aspiration and that is why Pacquiao cannot be the President of the Philippines. All heart and a simple mind will inadvertently trigger the law of unintended consequences to the detriment of the Philippines.
Vote Leni Robredo for President!















